[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora-11-x86_64-CHECKSUM wrong?



On 06/09/2009 05:30 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> alan wrote:
>> The checksum file is also signed with gpg. (Finally!)
> 
> They've been gpg signed for as long as I can recall.  Or do you mean
> that earlier snapshots had unsigned checksum files?

RCs earlier than RC4 had unsigned checksum files, and RC4's checksum
file was also originally unsigned, before it was decided to push it.  A
few mirrors have these unsigned files instead of the correct signed ones.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]