[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: gstreamer-plugins-bad where art thou?



On 16.06.2009 15:13, Brian Millett wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:57 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 16.06.2009 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2009 04:55 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
>>>> trying to update the gstreamer packages, there seems to be one missing:
>>>>
>>>> Transaction Check Error:
>>>>   file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so from install of
>>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from
>>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586
>>>>   file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflv.so from install of
>>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from
>>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586
>>>>   file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgsty4menc.so from install of
>>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from
>>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586
>>>> Did gstreamer-plugins-bad not get built?
>>> New version is in the rpmfusion free testing repo
>> Just a detail, but the new gstreamer-plugins-bad packages were in the
>> stable updates repos of RPM Fusion for round about five hours already
>> when you wrote this (they should have been pushed there at in parallel
>> with the new gstreamer-packages from Fedora, but weren't due to an
>> stupid error on my side; sigh).
> 
> No problem.  All is well.

Not really. People will run into those problems for 24 hours for all
updates with tight interdeps (gstreamer sometimes,
xine-lib-extras-freeworld, all kmod, and some other packages/kind of
updates), even if RPM Fusion works perfectly and pushes all updates at
exactly the same times as the associated package counterpart in Fedora.

We need a fix for that, as it's quite bad for Fedora's fame afics.

CU
knurd


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]