[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: F11 bind-chroot - a question?



Tim:
>> without the symlinks, you need two tools:  One for the chrooted, or
>> another for the non-chrooted files.  Or one that magically works on
>> the right file.


Mail Lists:
>   That is just bad app design - the app needs to learn about which
> root to use for the config files - should be settable.

And what's that going to do when a user who has a chrooted system, but
doesn't understand this, creates their own /etc/named.conf file?  (A
common enough occurrence.)

>    No app should rely on some non-standard links just coz its the easy
> way. Its not a lot of work to fix this correctly.

There's nothing non-standard about symlinks.  It's a very standard way
with dealing with this issue.

-- 
[tim localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.24-78.2.53.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]