ease of alpine -> thunderbird migration?

[Steven W. Orr]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/19/09 17:35, quoth Steven W. Orr:

> But you are right, I should give back and doc what I did. I'll look at it in
> the next few days on my own wiki.
> 

Ok. This is a first cut. I'll try to refine it, especially if people ask me
questions that I can just add to the page.

http://steveo.syslang.net/tb/

I was thinking about putting on my wiki, but this really isn't about what
experiences other people have had. This is what I learned to get it working
for me.

If you like it then you can buy me a beer. Not one of those "virtual beers";
just the ones that actually taste good. Preferably a Guinness with a shamrock
on the top. ;-)

In addition, I'm using 2.0.0.21 of TB because that's what came with F10, and
the fact that mail is sort of crucial for me. But now I'm hearing that 3.2?
Beta has been out for a loong time and I'm wondering if it's safe to use or
will it cause all the magic blue smoke from my machine to leak out. Maybe I
should give it a blast?

- --
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAko+/QEACgkQRIVy4fC+NyT/4QCdGnga6Idy/ioSqLDgyI0tQw2g
PmUAnjXRRURDGhutFWGZL3YfIiyrJQhv
=ukqy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----