[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: selinux-policy-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch - slight hiccup!





Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> 
> 
> This is very strange, I have no idea why SELinux update would do this,
> and suspect that something else might have gone wrong.  Were there other
> packages in the update?
> 
> I will update my F10 and see what is going on.
> 
> Could be someone is doing a chcon -t usr_t in a post install script?
> 
> selinux-policy should only be doing the equivalent of a restorecon -vR
> in its post install.  Actually executes fixfiles
> "fixfiles -C ${FILE_CONTEXT}.pre restore"
> 
> Which figures out what was different between the old file context and
> the new and runs restorecon on them.
> 
> 

Dan, I had a problem this morning on another machine where there is a bind
mounted /var/spool/mail directory (restorecon -vR /var/spool/mail seems to
have fixed it). In all the cases where the user contexts had a problem were
machines with bind mounted /home areas.  I wonder if this could be the
common factor?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/selinux-policy-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch---slight-hiccup%21-tp22296524p22305496.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]