[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10



On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:34:15 -0800 (PST), Antonio wrote:

> 
> Tried to update Fedora 10 x86_64, but 
> 
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
>   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
>   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 (installed)
> [root localhost ~]# 
> 
> 
> [root localhost ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release 
> Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
> [root localhost ~]# uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antonio

After years of using Fedora, could you *please* analyse such problems a bit
prior to posting a message that lacks the details?
Do show your "yum repolist". Don't truncate the Yum output.
Do query the repositories and verify that you see the latest pkg releases.
Show what package releases are available.
Do query your RPM database for duplicate packages. Clean them
up with relevant tools (man package-cleanup).
There has been an upgrade of libkipi and digikam on Feb 17th:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1421


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]