dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10
Antonio Olivares
olivares14031 at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 3 13:12:32 UTC 2009
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 1:49 AM
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:34:15 -0800 (PST), Antonio wrote:
>
> >
> > Tried to update Fedora 10 x86_64, but
> >
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from
> installed has depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from installed
> has depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > [root at localhost ~]#
> >
> >
> > [root at localhost ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release
> > Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
> > [root at localhost ~]# uname -a
> > Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64
> #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Antonio
>
> After years of using Fedora, could you *please* analyse
> such problems a bit
> prior to posting a message that lacks the details?
> Do show your "yum repolist". Don't truncate
> the Yum output.
> Do query the repositories and verify that you see the
> latest pkg releases.
> Show what package releases are available.
> Do query your RPM database for duplicate packages. Clean
> them
> up with relevant tools (man package-cleanup).
> There has been an upgrade of libkipi and digikam on Feb
> 17th:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1421
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
This should not happen, and hence the post. Updating again seems to cure it
Regards,
Antonio
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list