Question about whehter xinetd is still used.

[Tim]

On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 22:11 -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Is there a movement to get rid of xinetd? It's just that I remember
> that the trend used to be to move more server processes to be added to
> the inetd config.

As I recall, the trend was to move away from it, with individual scripts
per service rather than an all encompassing inetd.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.