[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: any fundamental difference between fedora and suse NFSv4?



On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Ed Greshko wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   i'm currently reviewing a doc on suse linux enterprise 11, the
> > section on NFS, but i don't have a SLES 11 machine in front of me.
> > could anyone who uses both SLES 11 and fedora 12 comment on how
> > indistinguishable the NFS setups are across those two distros?
> >
> >   so far, i haven't seen a lot that's massively incompatible, and i
> > wouldn't expect to.  obviously, the fundamental files are going to be
> > the same.
> >
> I haven't use suse in quite some time.  Are you asking about SLES
> (which is the equivalent of RHEL) or openSUSE which is more akin to
> Fedora, AFAIK?

  technically, SLES 11, but i have to imagine that there's not going
to be a lot of difference between the two in terms of NFS.

> Should I get the chance to experiment with NFSv4 on it I will.
> Probably try to export and mount file systems from/to a F12 system.
> Sounds like a nice challenge.

  i'm currently digging through the docs and scripts, and my current
challenge is to see what it takes to set up simple NFS on f12 using
*only* nfsv4 with no earlier version compatibility.  so far, still a
bug or two in the system.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]