[Fedora-livecd-list] Unable to exclude firefox

[Sebastian Vahl]

Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Sebastian Vahl:
> Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > > I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although the
> > > xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea
> > > why it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it from
> > > livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with
> > > "-firefox") and it shouldn't be needed by any package (since xulrunner
> > > is there). I can easily remove it on a running livecd (or even with
> > > "--shell") and rpm is not complaining about dependencies then.
> > >
> > > firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's maybe
> > > related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs).
> >
> > Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section?  If not
> > and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then
> > firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of
> > gecko-libs
>
> No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't even want
> this one (but that's another problem: #420101).
>
> So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned
> gecko-libs and file a bug against that package?

Mhh. The only package requireing gecko-libs is yelp. But that one has a 
versioned require (gecko-libs = 1.9).

So this problem may also be fixed as a side-effect when #420101 is resolved. 
But I'm still wondering why firefox is pulled in?

Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/attachments/20071212/15b306de/attachment.sig>