[Fedora-livecd-list] liveinst conflicts with anaconda

Greg Dekoenigsberg gdk at redhat.com
Fri Mar 23 21:53:14 UTC 2007


On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> It is not unreasonable at all. The liveinst package should have been on the 
> officially repositories. The review and the process was bypassed to get test 
> 2 on time which is fine but let's not use that as a excuse not to add a 
> simple obsolete to Anaconda to ensure that users can update properly. We 
> should strive to provide sane updates paths from every release to every 
> release regardless of whether it is a test or not. It might not be possible 
> in some corner cases which this is not. Our end users and testers deserve 
> more respect for their time.

Assuming there are no unintended consequence for adding this obsolete, and 
assuming that it will make a better experience for some srt of users, and 
assuming that it's a simple fix...

...I find myself in agreement with Rahul.  But then, that's a lot of 
assumptions, and I'm no expert, eh?

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the Fedora-livecd-list mailing list