[Fedora-livecd-list] Git/Rawhide vs. v009/F7 ?

[Tim Wood]

Two different recommendations have been posted on what version of  
Fedora to use (F7 presumably with livecd-tools 009 vs. rawhide and  
livecd-tools from git).  Rawhide and git (seems to me) to be a  
formula for a very unstable development environment.  But, livecd- 
tools 009 and F7 seem to be pretty out of date.  BUT... that's my  
guessing. Why one combination versus the other from someone in the  
livecd development loop?

And how do you modify grub arguments for a livecd (besides doing  
weird foo on a created image...)?


On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Alexandre Magaz Graça wrote:
>> Could someone give some hint about how to find out what is making  
>> it fail?
>
> I encountered tracebacks only when creating live images on a F7 box?
> Use a rawhide box instead with the git version of livecd-tools
>
> However my livecd images built on F8 automatically do a media check !!
> Thus wasting about 15 minutes on a 2.7GHZ box.
> Then there's kernel panics.
>
> The only way I could boot these livecd images is to edit the  
> arguments on grub:
> * removing "check" ??? <<<<<<<<<<< why is this by default ????????
> * added enforcing=0
>
> regards,
> Chitlesh
>
> -- 
> http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
>
> --
> Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
> Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
>