[Fedora-livecd-list] livecd-iso-to-disk broken in F9?

Todd N todd655495 at yahoo.com
Thu May 29 18:56:25 UTC 2008


These are our results.  [/dev/sr0 on /mnt/live type iso9660 (ro)]
   
  [root at localhost LiveOS]# sh -x ./livecd-iso-to-disk
  --reset-mbr --noverify /dev/sr0 /dev/sda1
  + export
  PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin
  +
  PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin
  ++ id -u
  + '[' 0 '!=' 0 ']'
  + '[' 4 -gt 2 ']'
  + case $1 in
  + resetmbr=1
  + shift
  + '[' 3 -gt 2 ']'
  + case $1 in
  + noverify=1
  + shift
  + '[' 2 -gt 2 ']'
  ++ readlink -f /dev/sr0
  + ISO=/dev/sr0
  + USBDEV=/dev/sda1
  + '[' -z /dev/sr0 -o '!' -f /dev/sr0 ']'
  + usage
  + echo './livecd-iso-to-disk [--reset-mbr]
  [--noverify] [--overlay-size-mb <size>] <isopath>
  <usbstick device>'
  ./livecd-iso-to-disk [--reset-mbr] [--noverify]
  [--overlay-size-mb <size>] <isopath> <usbstick device>
  + exit 1
  

Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> wrote:
  Try running it with sh -x... that should at least give you an idea of 
where it's going wrong

Jeremy

Todd N wrote:
> Correction: we also tried /dev/live as the input parameter (not 
> /mnt/live). Also, this method worked in Fedora 9 Preview as well.
> 
> Todd
> 
> */Todd N /* wrote:
> 
> Yes, we use the noverify and reset-mbr options along with /dev/sr0
> as the input (and have also tried /mnt/live?) and /dev/sda1 as the
> output (no hard drive, so this corresponds to the USB). Worked fine
> previously, but now returns the usage() message.
> 
> */Jeremy Katz /* wrote:
> 
> Todd N wrote:
> > We are trying to use the livecd-iso-to-disk script in Fedora
> 9 to create
> > a bootable USB drive. When running this script from a command
> prompt:
> >
> > # ./livecd-iso-to-disk
> >
> > all we get back is a line showing the command usage. However,
> the same
> > command entered in Fedora 8, or even in Fedora 9 Beta, works
> fine. Has
> > anyone else had this issue?
> 
> Err... you need to give it more arguments than just that :) It's
> been
> working fine for me and I use it on a very regular basis
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> --
> Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
> Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
> Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
> Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list

--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list


       
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/attachments/20080529/5d2beb84/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-livecd-list mailing list