Saving space: drop Omni?

[Tim Waugh]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:42:06AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Who's to say that by not focusing resources on Omni that are better used
> elsewhere we aren't?

Good point -- for example, take a look at the size of the patch I had
to make to get Omni to compile with GCC 4.

Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20050309/472c7695/attachment.sig>