[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...



On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:38:36AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> When someone doesn't respond, I have a preference for using,
> CURRENTRELEASE, RAWHIDE, NEXTRELEASE, or ERRATA resolutions
> using a comment of the nature:
> 
> "The information we've requested above is required in order
>  to review this problem report further and diagnose/fix the
>  issue if it is still present.  Since there haven't been any
>  updates to the report in quite a long time now after we've
>  requested additional information, we're assuming the problem
>  is either no longer present in our current OS release, or
>  that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem.
> 
>  Setting status to "CURRENTRELEASE", however if you still
>  experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
>  Core release and are still interested in Red Hat tracking
>  the issue, and assisting in troubleshooting the problem,
>  please feel free to provide the information requested above,
>  and reopen the report.
This is also abusing the bugzilla resolution status; if somebody
looks for a bug he is experiencing and finds it, he sees
"CURRENTRELEASE" when in fact it is "WE-WISH-IT-WERE-CURRENTRELEASE".
NOTABUG nor WONTFIX is perfect, but either provides more correct
information than CURRENTRELEASE.
	Mirek


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]