icon cache scriplet guideline update

[Rex Dieter]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Callum Lerwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:43 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Because, frankly, poo-pooing the current proposal/guidelines in favor 
>>> of some handy-wavy theoretical lacking-actual-implementation 
>>> solution, is no solution.
>>
>> Well, the point is, the current proposal does not address the "multiple
>> packages needlessly updating caches multiple times" problem at all. 
> 
> Fair enough, I'll investigate hooking into rpm's %posttrans hooks.  My 
> findings so far are promising.

I formally withdraw the iconcache proposal as-is, pending investigation 
of the previously unaddressed "needlessly updating cache multiple times" 
issue.

-- Rex