Bugzilla tickets for old Fedora releases

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:01:00PM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:30:08AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> >> >We invite all maintainers to have a look at open tickets for those old
> >> >releases and take appropriate actions as they see fit: move to newer
> >> >releases or close down.
> >> I'd like to  close a couple of mine. Given they are not applicable to
> >> FC5 and newer, would you suggest me to I close them as WONTFIX or
> >> NEXTRELEASE ?
> >
> >I'd say: the former if it's not applicable because it's functionality that
> >has been dropped or replaced with something else. The latter if FC5 or 
> >newer
> >has a version or patch that actually fixes the issue.
> >
> 
> The latter seems to be my case. So I have 2 different opinions...

Just take a step back an ask yourself "has the issue been dropped or
has it been fixed one way or another"?

WONTFIX means you stay on your problem even after an upgrade,
NEXTRELEASE means the problem goes away by upgrading. Note: upgrading,
not fresh-installs.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070108/7a73e3e6/attachment.sig>