EPEL Branches

[Tim Burke]

Chris Ricker wrote:
>
>
> Also, with the brave new world of Core and Extras merged, is it just 
> "anything in Fedora that's not in RHEL is fine for EPEL", or what?
>
>   
Perhaps a small distinction, but I think the definition is a little 
broader.. ie a little more than RHEL... extending to the layered 
products.  Specifically, I propose that EPEL is "FE stuff that RH 
doesn't otherwise ship that someone volunteers to do the work in EPEL".  
That would preclude things like our cluster and directory server 
packages from simply being rebuilt and pushed in EPEL.