Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags

Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs at math.uh.edu
Wed Jan 31 16:41:56 UTC 2007


>>>>> "WT" == Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> writes:

WT> OK, it seems the only real drawback to "ASSIGNED to owner instead
WT> of reviewer" is Tibbs' good point about being able to see it on
WT> frontpage.cgi.

I'm happy as long as I can get to the list of packages I'm reviewing
it via some query, although I do admit that the frontpage view is
quite convenient.

WT> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/request.cgi dkl mentioned
WT> this interface that provides a way to query for flags.

That page seems to take ages upon ages to load; does it include some
sort of default query?

Just a query for the extras-review flag takes well over half a minute,
butt does show one ticket (which must have been some sort of
experiment from many months ago).

So, can someone who knows the details fill me in on the proper way for
doing the following tasks?  There don't seem to be any fedora-review
flags set in the database so at the moment it's tough to experiment.

Get a list of all tickets up for review which do not currently have
  reviewers.
Sign myself up to review one of those packages.
Get a list of all the packages I'm currently reviewing.
Get a list of all tickets up for review which have reviewers.
  (Sometimes I like to browse them and help if I can.)

Currently it doesn't look like you only query on the presence of a
flag and not its status, which could be problematic.  I'm sure I'm
missing something.  Also, the request.cgi interface seems to have no
way to query only open bugs.  If there really is no way to do this
then we'll have to come up with something, because things are going to
break down badly with 1000 packages up for review.

 - J<




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list