foo vs. foo+

[Ville Skyttä]

On Saturday 21 July 2007, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:15:19AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Ok so far, but foo+ also needs a "Provides: foo", and I wonder if is
> >   Provides: foo
> >   Conflicts: foo
> > really is a good idea. And can/should we use versioned Provides: here?
>
> Unless I am wrong, yum (rpm) won't care about versioned Provides:, and
> replace foo+ with foo (I had such issues with libnet10/libnet).

Do you have a test case available where rpm/yum ignores the version?