Plan for tomorrow's (20070604) Release Engineering meeting

[Patrice Dumas]

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Then the rel-eng would see that (together with the changelog entry), and 
> > block if something seems dubious, or if it is too late in the freeze. It 
> 
> Their ability to do that, under those circumstances, might be limited.
> Rel-eng doesn't immediately know if it's too invasive, which is why a
> request is sent.  Not all changelogs are descriptive.  But perhaps

Blocking if changelogs are not descriptive enough seems completly
reasonable to me (in a period of freeze).

> something better could be done, yes.
> 
> Also remember there will be a point in time where things are completely
> frozen so that ISOs can be made.  During that (relatively) short period
> of time, the push feature would be disabled.

Of course. This period could be not so short, especially if the next
release has been already branched.

--
Pat