Plan for tomorrow's (20070604) Release Engineering meeting

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Mon Jun 4 14:09:44 UTC 2007


On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:45:10AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2007 08:42:28 Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I would suggest to consider at least one full rebuild [1] before the
> > final freeze (e.g. as part of the pre-freeze process) and of course to
> > allow for enough time between the freeze and the GA to shake out any
> > bugs that will surface by that process.
> >
> > [1] "full" = where it makes sense, e.g. not for pure data packages,
> >     firmwares and other parts that are really not affected by the
> >     build environment.
> 
> Hasn't this been discussed over and over again within FESCo?  I'd much prefer 
> to make this a case by case basis per release.

Can this really be case by case?

Or perhaps even from a different POV: If the distribution hasn't
changed enough to warrant a rebuild of many packages (for example for
F7 we already had 80-90% non-mass rebuilds anyway), then is it worth
releasing?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070604/24a0f49d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list