use disttag ".1" for devel to avoid confusion (was: Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20070604) Release Engineering meeting)

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 23:21:28 UTC 2007


On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:18:46 Nils Philippsen wrote:
> That needn't be the case. Packages could be built in a "from the ground
> up" order beginning with what's by default in the buildroots (i.e. what
> doesn't need to be build-required). This gets only ambiguous with cyclic
> build-dependencies in which case we'd have to fall back to something
> else (ls ordering, python hash ordering or even "bug the release
> engineers and let them decide" ;-)).

And even then, unless we introduce pauses between each build (to the order of 
20~ minutes) we're not really going to make use of those rebuilt packages for 
later builds.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070607/c14a1394/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list