Plan for Today's (20070625) Release Engineering meeting

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 25 June 2007 13:01:59 Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> If you implement any mechanism to block an update, that is ok from my
> side. but I think
> is not good, if an update will promote to a higher stage without the
> explicit permission
> of the maintainer which is responsible for it.

I think the gameplan is that the maintainer would have to manually request the 
autotimeout at update submission time.  It wouldn't be pre-set.  But again, 
that's a detail to work out.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070625/ca6f3b73/attachment.sig>