[Guidelines Change] Conflicts

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Josh Boyer schrieb:
> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 10:14 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Just wondering (and *not* meant as a critique!): Wasn't the "unwritten
>>> rule" that the Packaging Committee handles theoretical packaging while
>>> FESCo handles practical packaging? Or did I get something wrong?
>>> *If* the Packaging Committee handles practical packaging like "Approve
>>> Conflicts" I'd suggest we should consider moving "Request for packages
>>> with static libs" and maybe "Appoval requests for kmod packages" from
>>> FESCo's duty's over to the Packaging Committee.
>> Not quite sure. Does FESCo want to handle "practical packaging" or push
>> it to the FPC?
> Personally, I'd rather leave it to FESCo.

+1, but I don't really care -- but I'd prefer if responsibilities are
clearly differentiated in areas. IOW: one group should handle kmods,
static libs and conflicts.

CU
thl