Plan for tomorrows (20070517) FESCO meeting
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Thu May 17 16:01:48 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 11:56 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:31 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> >> All we're really trying to do is make good packages. We've tried
> >> really
> >> hard to make guidelines that lead to good, clean,
> >> maintainable-long-after-you-are-dead packages.
> >>
> >
> > I hear what you are saying and I understand. What I'm saying is that
> > there's a fine line between making good packages and going over the
> > edge. So in your example, documenting is good. But if you end up with
> > an exception process? I think that probably crosses the line. Dispute
> > resolution, maybe. But I just worry that we're going somewhere we don't
> > want to be. Not sure how to properly put this into words.
>
> I'm totally in agreement that an exception process isn't somewhere we
> want to go. Arbitration when there's a dispute causes less impedance to
> actually getting things done, while still achieving the same goals.
But we're not even aware that there is a dispute, when people just
decide not to follow the guidelines. There is no "Packaging QA" group,
constantly auditing spec files.
~spot
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list