An alternate proposal to answer the guidelines question.

[Peter Jones]

Chris Weyl wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 5) if a maintainer still doesn't fix a package, the arbitrator lets
>> FESCO know that we need to start the orphan package process.
> 
> I like this, but think that step 5 should be something like "final
> enforcement rests with FESCo"...  Give them a little more flexibility
> than just forcibly orphaning a package.

+1


-- 
   Peter