[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

AWOL vs. adding comaintainer (Was: Re: A new version of gnome-applet-sensors)

On 2007-05-29 20:54:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 20:36:04 +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>> On 2007-05-28 9:51:18 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> (...)
>>> Either way I volunteer myself as co-maintainer for gnome-applet-sensors,
>>> because of my involvednes in lmsensors upstream.
>> Great! Even though we are still waiting for Aaron Kurtz reply I think
>> that having comaintainer will be good for g-a-s anyway, especially that
>> F7 (and updates for it) will be available for thousands of Fedora users
>> very soon.
>> In my opinion you could start procedure of comaintainer addition [1] and
>> update a package (also for FC-5 and FC-6 branches).
>> [1] - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure
> Rather start the AWOL procedure first.

I thought about AWOL, but it takes more time. Adding comaintainer could
be faster, but I don't know if it's required permission for current
maintainer to become a comaintainer?

2. Could be already mentioned bug [2] considered as a "asking for the
maintainer to respond"?

3. Has to be whole procedure carried by a person who want to take the
package over or (s)he has to only post a formal request to the
maintainers list?

[2] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235655


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]