the gray line

[Karsten Wade]

Please allow me to pull this discussion into a separate thread, as I'm
losing the details in the "Fedora Guide" thread.

Trying to understand what the current position is on linking to third-
party sites that -may- link to other sites that may have infringing
content.  In other words, fedorafaq.org, fedoraforum.org, etc.

My current understanding is:

* We -can- send people to those sites, as general answer sites
* We -cannot- send people to those sites to "get your MP3s"
* This is because we are not able to control the content of any website,
from google.com to fedorafaq.org.  This is different from knowing that
the target URL has specific packages that circumvent stuff.

Is that clear as mud?

thx - Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20050724/de0dfece/attachment.sig>