[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: For this weeks meeting agenda...



Christopher Aillon wrote:

> On 09/10/2005 09:37 AM, Colin Charles wrote:
>
>> I'd like to discuss:
>>
>> FedoraMyths - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths
>> How can we use this further, and get it somewhat Red Hat blessed if we
>> need to
>>
> Drive-by feedback:
> I see a whole bunch of negative items in bold, and then the word FACT
> in bold right underneath it.  Someone quickly skimming will get the
> wrong idea.  Highlight the positive as a contra to the negative. 
> Don't highlight the negative assuming people will read the rebuttal.
>
The current appearance of the document is largely dictated by the
perspective and the form of the wiki.  The 'myths' are the focus of the
document.  Dispelling them with the facts is its purpose.  It is not
meant to be read by drive-by reviewers.  People who view the page are
looking for reasons.  That said, I will try to go back and improve the
contrast to better highlight the facts.

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 n-man com

www.n-man.com
-- 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]