Proposed Logo

[Greg DeKoenigsberg]

Heh heh heh!  So it's hit the masses with full force!

"The logo isn't at all appealing. Looks very amateur. No offence but 
according to the Wiki project, it's been getting rave reviews? Someone 
hand me a baseball bat. I'm no designer but this is way off."

"As lukewarm as I am about the current proposals, have you seen some of
the other ideas put forward? Yikes!"

"I prefer the Blue Fedora hat."

"The 'attractiveness' component is lacking. Maybe more rounded, more
attractive colors, etc. It looks too much like broken links."

So Matt, more grist for the mill.  At this point I think we're pretty far 
down the acceptance path, though.

--g

(p.s. I understand that there's a lot you can do with fonts.)

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Stanton Finley wrote:

> I was just following the thread at
> http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=78202. I believe the
> proposed logo is too flat and two-dimensional. At least the hat logos
> gave the appearance of a three dimensional object...leaves me cold. The
> graphical quality of the logo should at least match the quality of the
> OS.
> 
> Stan Finley
> http://stanton-finley.net/
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>