[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposed Logo



I believe it has already been established that there will be no hat.
However there should be some art. The logo should not appear to have
been created using a vector based 2D CAD application with color fill.
And where is the warmth?

On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:37 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> Heh heh heh!  So it's hit the masses with full force!
> 
> "The logo isn't at all appealing. Looks very amateur. No offence but 
> according to the Wiki project, it's been getting rave reviews? Someone 
> hand me a baseball bat. I'm no designer but this is way off."
> 
> "As lukewarm as I am about the current proposals, have you seen some of
> the other ideas put forward? Yikes!"
> 
> "I prefer the Blue Fedora hat."
> 
> "The 'attractiveness' component is lacking. Maybe more rounded, more
> attractive colors, etc. It looks too much like broken links."
> 
> So Matt, more grist for the mill.  At this point I think we're pretty far 
> down the acceptance path, though.
> 
> --g
> 
> (p.s. I understand that there's a lot you can do with fonts.)
> 
> _____________________  ____________________________________________
>   Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
>  Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
>              Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
>                      ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]