[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Proposed Logo



My final twopence on the matter then. Mcluhan was right. In the absence
of an artist's sensibilities and his brush (even though the brush may be
digital) the machine easily masters the grim and the dumb.

Stanton Finley
http://stanton-finley.net/

On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 14:10 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Stanton Finley wrote:
> 
> > I believe it has already been established that there will be no hat.
> > However there should be some art. The logo should not appear to have
> > been created using a vector based 2D CAD application with color fill.
> > And where is the warmth?
> 
> You forgot to add "my $0.02."  :)
> 
> See, here's the deal: *every* logo that is *any* good will simply fail to 
> appeal to some segment of the audience.  Period.
> 
> Anyway... we've entrusted the design of this logo to Matt, who can take 
> this feedback as he sees fit.
> 
> --g
> 
> _____________________  ____________________________________________
>   Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
>  Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
>              Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
>                      ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]