[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: The ongoing Fedora Forum discussion



On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 14:22 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:

> We wanted enough input to validate the direction the logo should take.  
> The mechanism we used to gather that input was the Fedora marketing list.  
> Why?  Because this is *precisely* why the Fedora marketing group exists.  
> And yes, that *necessarily* excludes 99% of the Fedora community -- but it
> *includes* the 1% who care enough about the direction of Fedora's brand to
> get *directly* involved.

It's a really sad state of affairs we are in.  

Besides the marketing project, there is Extras and documentation that
have *very* high levels of community involvement.  In fact, the
community members out number the @redhat.com people, hands down.

These forum posts insult every one of those community people, including
Matt.  As with anything in open source, they better get their facts
straight before they start foaming at the mouth, or they deserve the bit
bucket they get put in.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]