Fedora derivatives branding discussion

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That is no longer based on Fedora.  That includes parts of Fedora, but
> adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora.  Get the package in
> Extras (;

What? That makes no logical sense. You're saying that something takes a
_base_ of Fedora and builds on that base by adding additional packages is
some way not _based_ on Fedora?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>