[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5Test2(LWN): Some comments)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>
>>> Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>>>
>>>>>> Developers have been communicating that this release
>>>>>> cycle was only for FC5 for quite a while now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, and it seems that was not enough.
>>>>
>>>> Depends on where you get the information from. For example,
>>>> distrowatch corrected its previous misconception recently.
>>>> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1
>>>
>>> That's not "official" -
>>>
>> What do you consider official?.
>
>
> Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed
> mail to one of the mailinglists from a official person. A
> press-release.
>
> But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or
> wikipedia-writers.
>
>> How do we communicate all the official information out there to
>> make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
>
>
> At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
> community if they are floating around like this one.
>
> How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the
> best place because I suspect some people don't trust the
> informations there.

I agree... That's (amongst others) the purpose of the fedora-announce
mailing list, is it not?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD3nE0XM+XOp70dwoRAk5wAJ9PSu6LKEU7RvHFUo4xCW+bWECx1ACfcci5
csgJfk30mpjFjeDsZS7wQYw=
=5Gvn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]