Fedora more successful, developer-wise, than Ubuntu

[Marc Wiriadisastra]

On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:06 +0300, Zhukov Pavel wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 3:20 PM, Marc Wiriadisastra <marc at mwiriadi.id.au> wrote:
> > Interesting post about whether Fedora is more popular for dev's than
> > Ubuntu.
> >
> > http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu
> >
> > I personally don't think it's a fair comparison because Ubuntu is
> > derived from Debian and there is cross over.  What I would like to see
> > is a comparison with Debian and Fedora to see what the actual numbers
> > are.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> > Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
> >
> Fedora project managed by RH. It means strict roadmap, defined
> chekpoints, clear release cycle.
> Debian on the other hand, fully community driven. no checkpoints, no
> erelease cycle, no "head": Debian Project Leader have very limited
> premissions.
> 

I disagree while Fedora project is sponsored by RH the majority of the
contributors are from the community.  Max blogged about this the other
day if I remember correctly.  

I'm not to sure what the definition of a community project is but I
would have thought more than 50% constitutes a community project?

My point related mainly to developer-wise which translates to packagers
and docs I think.

Cheers,

Marc