[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Hats!



On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 23:17 +0100, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> Marek Mahut wrote:
> > Karsten Wade wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> >>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
> >>>> Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit :
> >>>> Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL
> >>>> and Fedora
> >>> This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again.
> >>
> >> Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again?
> >>
> >>> Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think
> >>> like
> >>> i do.
> >>
> >> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
> >> Ambassadors.  
> >
> > As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general.
> >
> > "... that we not connect hats, red in color or otherwise ..."[1]
> >
> >
> > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct
> >
> This may actually pose a problem for me as I regularly (especially in
> the rain) wear a black fedora, and a few people have asked me if the
> fact I support Fedora is because of, or related to, this.
> 
> Not that I intentionally connect the two, but average folk still seem to
> make that link...
> 

If one is linked to Fedora in any way, to be kindly asked to refrain
from using symbols such as red hats sounds reasonable to me.
I have a hard time believing though, that one just has to buy that *any*
hat should be avoided. I mean, that's just something that some people
wear.
Starting to feel relieved that the much appreciated Linux firm isn't
called Green Shirt, or Black Sandal? ;)

herman


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]