Fedora struggles with harm reduction via Codec Buddy
jkeating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Thu Nov 1 14:19:19 UTC 2007
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:
> Let's take the scenario a step further. What happens when someone
> puts a piece of free crippleware into Fedora, the sole purpose of
> which is to upsell to something that isn't crippleware? How will we
> feel about that?
>
> This is just the first time we've had to face these kinds of issues.
> As more business concerns coalesce around Fedora, it won't be the
> last.
This is not the correct venue to argue about such things though. I'd
be happy to argue with people about this elsewhere though!
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20071101/cf8ce659/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-marketing-list
mailing list