Looking back previous issues

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 01:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> If you prioritize the things that are of the interest to users as the 
> first few sections then we don't have to limit the number of items 
> covered in the developer section that follows.

+1

In particular, fedora-devel-list can have very important or interesting
items.  I don't think we should curtail coverage for an artificial cap.
OTOH, we don't have to cover _every_ thread. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-news-list/attachments/20070411/ad33e3fc/attachment.sig>