YUM vs Smart vs Apt-Get

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:51 +0200, Eli Wapniarski wrote:

> At the end of the debate, I would like to get a public consensus and 
> commtiment against a standard method for package management. What is 
> important about this is basic security and stability of Fedora based systems 
> which includes Redhat Enterprise and Centos releases.
> 
> By getting feedback from real world users and developers in an open debate 
> perhaps shortcommings and strengths of all three systems would be discussed 
> based on real world working experience as opposed to theoretical self 
> congratulations that developers are prone to getting used to the product that 
> they've developed.

In that case, it is worth doing your homework, if you haven't.  Much of
your original email contained arguments that I think have been addressed
on fedora-devel-list.  Some reasoned Google searches (yum versus apt-get
site:redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list) should turn up list threads.

-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-news-list/attachments/20071207/7ff1bdbd/attachment.sig>