[Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 18 14:08:15 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          QAContact|fedora-extras-              |fedora-package-
                   |list at redhat.com             |review at redhat.com

wart at kobold.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org




------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2006-04-18 10:07 EST -------
The real conflict with these two libraries is that they both create libraries
with the basename of 'alogg'.  If you're worried about conflicts, then renaming
the spec file isn't enough.

The packaging guidelines don't give an unambiguous answer about the name, however:
"When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project
name from which this software came."
In this case, the upstream tarball and project name don't match.  As a fallback:
"If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past,
then you should try to match their name for consistency."
In this case, I wasn't able to find any other distributions that package this
particular library.  I did find the other 'alogg' in Debian, however.  I would
interpret the guidelines to mean that this other alogg should get priority for
the 'alogg' name, and Hans' choice to use AllegroOgg to match the upstream
package name is entirely appropriate.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list