[Bug 189699] Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 27 05:42:32 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnucap - The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189699
------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-04-27 01:42 EST -------
rpmlint output:
E: gnucap configure-without-libdir-spec
- The configure script was not created by autoconf, and does not
respond to a --libdir flag.
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos2.cc ../d_mos2.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos4.cc ../d_mos4.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos6.cc ../d_mos6.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos1.cc ../d_mos1.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos7.cc ../d_mos7.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos5.cc ../d_mos5.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos3.cc ../d_mos3.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_bjt.cc ../d_bjt.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos.cc ../d_mos.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_diode.cc ../d_diode.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos_base.cc ../d_mos_base.cc
W: gnucap-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/src/debug/gnucap-0.34/src/O/d_mos123.cc ../d_mos123.cc
- The build system compiles against symlinks to the actual source files, which
seems to confuse rpmbuild when it creates the debuginfo package. You might
try using hardlinks instead of softlinks to work around this.
MUST
====
* Package and spec file named appropriately
* GPL license ok, license file included
* spec file legible and in Am. English
* Sources match upstream:
0d346f02a38c544fda6f8d7ec4f8b45e gnucap-0.34.tar.gz
* Compiles and builds in mock on:
FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64
* No excessive BR:
* No locales
* No shared libraries
* Not relocatable
* Does not create any directories that it should own
* No duplicate %files
* %clean ok
* Contains code, not content
* %doc ok
* No -devel package needed
* No .desktop file needed
QUESTIONS
=========
* There seems to be two home pages for gnucap. The one listed in the
spec file at www.gnu.org lists 0.31 as the most recent version. But
a similarly looking page at http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gnucap
shows 0.34. Why the two home pages?
MUSTFIX
=======
* Add %{?_smp_mflags} to 'make'. Intial tests show that it builds fine
with this flag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list