[Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Apr 29 08:46:20 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163779                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-04-29 04:46 EST -------
There wasn't much discusion, so I'm going to "fix" this by doing things as
suggested in my initial proposal to the list:

So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support libraries
both installing:

/usr/lib/libalogg.so

One of them installs:
alogg.h

And the other:
alogg/alogg.h


Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of solving
this by:

-give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them
 both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg?
-putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include:
 /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h)
 /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h)
-modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg
-use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg
-patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem
 can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support
 as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its
 background music back).


I'll post links to a new specfile and SRPM once I'm done, in the mean time I'm
resetting this to FE-REVIEW :|

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list