[Bug 202437] Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 05:22:36 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-08-16 01:12 EST -------
ugh. I thought I checked all the files, but I missed that patch, you are right. 
Sorry for the trouble...

Since this is pretty much a totally new package,
I will go ahead and run thru my review checklist on it
again. ;)

OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (LGPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
6ce26e1b710ce52def4ec22637cd5176  SDL_Perl-2.1.3.tar.gz
6ce26e1b710ce52def4ec22637cd5176  SDL_Perl-2.1.3.tar.gz.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang
n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
n/a - .la files are removed.
n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
See below - No rpmlint output.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
OK - Should build in mock.

Issues:

1. rpmlint says:

W: perl-SDL strange-permission filter-depends.sh 0755

I think that can be ignored. It should be 755 I would think.

2. I see the package is providing:
perl(Walker)
and
perl(main)
Is that correct or should those be filtered out as well?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list