[Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 29 14:51:12 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2006-08-29 10:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
>     Try to change "make install" option so that (perhaps) 
>     most files can keep timestamps. In xscreensaver case (I maintain
>     xscreensaver), I use 
> 
> 	  make INSTALL="install -p" install
> 
>     Check if this package accepts such options, or, if not,

It accepts "-p" ::)
make INSTALL="install -p" install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}

> 
>   * File and Directory Ownership
> 
>   - %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme
>     %{gedadocdir}/man
> 
>     I don't know why these empty directories needs to be 
>     included in this package. 

> 3. Other things I have noticed :
> 
> 
>   - Consider if /usr/share/gEDA/docs can be moved
>     to usual document files' location, i.e.
>     /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-%{version}
> 

Actually geda-gsymbols are required by geda-gschem geda-gsymcheck geda-doc
geda-gattrib geda-gnetlist geda-utils.
And all these are required by geda which is a suite.  (though i haven't YET
included them as Requires in the geda package)

Hence these act as a centralised repository for geda.

>   - I will attach the file entry of geda-symbols rebuilt in
>     mock. Please check if all files you want to install in
>     this package are correctly packaged.

Yes, everything is included :) luckily

Updated:
SPEC: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols.spec
SRPM: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-symbols-20060123-4.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list