[Bug 218574] Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 7 07:23:06 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNPP - Perl modules for the Simple Network Pager Protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218574
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-12-07 02:23 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS.
+ source files match upstream.
18f61a774906cd27ca14dcbf311e6bf0 Net-SNPP-1.17.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ %check used and its result in mock build is
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=16, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.15 CPU)
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Followed perl packaging guidelines.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list