[Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mozldap
Alias: mozldap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401





------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com  2006-12-08 13:07 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> You can either
> a) go along and *not* do any symlinking on the packaging level. E.g. the 'so's
>    remain in the core package and there are no so symlinks in *-devel
> b) clean it up and rename the SONAMEs from lib*ldap60.so -> lib*ldap.so.6 with
>    a patch against the build in the tarball.
> 
> a) is quick and dirty and matches current upstream methology, b) is clean and
> proper, but requires you to get the patch submitted upstream, otherwise we'll be
> breaking library ABI.

Note that mozldap follows the Mozilla library naming conventions that are used
by NSPR and NSS which have been in Fedora for a while now (e.g. libnspr4.so,
libnss3.so, etc.).  So, unless there are plans to also convert those libraries
to the proper naming convention, I think it suffices to stick with
libldap60.so.6.0.0.  It should not be a big deal to put the proper so name in
the shared libraries, so that the main package will have 
libldap60.so.6.0.0
and the devel package will have
libldap60.so


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.