[Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-12-27 16:58 EST -------
I almost forgot about it too.

* source files match upstream:
   b0cbdf1397f1a16ad6e34a39bbb12382  Perl6-Bible-0.30.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream, but
appropriate clarification is included in the package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none needed)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Perl6::Bible)
   perl-Perl6-Bible = 0.30-2.fc7
  =
   /usr/bin/perl
   perl >= 0:5.000
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(File::Spec)
   perl(Perl6::Bible)
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=2, Tests=2,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr +  0.03 csys =  0.06 CPU)
*  owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* This is mostly content, not code, but it is permissible content (package
documentation)
* This is pretty much all documentation; a -docs subpackage would be kind of dumb.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.  (Most of
the content is not marked %doc, as then the package would indeed be useless.)

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.