[Bug 220766] Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 28 12:09:50 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython -  a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766





------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au  2006-12-28 07:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I probably need to add a README.Fedora to the -bsp subpackage stating that the 
> libBSP support isn't available yet.

Or perhaps document it somewhere in the fedoraproject.org/wiki :)
Since in the /usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI, it states,

The module Scientific.MPI is documented in the ScientificPython
manual. The main purpose of this file is to explain how to install
ScientificPython with MPI support.[...]

You could possibly add useful information from that file to the wiki page
without those installation notes. Then
/usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/README.MPI might be useless, afterwards 
/usr/share/doc/ScientificPython-mpi-2.6/impipython could be at /usr/bin/impipython

What do you think ?
Since, I'm concerned too with scientific packages at Fedora, possibly we could
gather some packagers (scientific packages) to document their changes during
packaging on the wiki.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/SciTech
We already have SciTech SIG, we could bring it to life, just like the PHP SIG is
doing a great job. And help each other during reviews, troubleshooting, etc...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list